Muslim Apologetics Borneo

Tag: English

  • Menjawab Christian Prince – “Quran sudah tidak asli kerana Hafs seorang pendusta”

    Menjawab Christian Prince – “Quran sudah tidak asli kerana Hafs seorang pendusta”

    Reading Time: 6 minutes

    بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم

    Hero Kristian abad ini iaitu Christian Prince telah membuat satu video yang menghiburkan hati muslim bertajuk “Quran sudah tidak asli kerana Hafs seorang pendusta”. Video tersebut boleh ditonton disini :
    – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcoVbYRmox4&feature=youtu.be

    Untuk makluman,video dari Si keldai Christian Prince tersebut telah pun dijawab secara mutlak oleh saudara muslim apologetics kita secara terperinci. Sila rujuk disini :

    (dari Channel MuslimAllegation Hunter)
    – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbyrhHeRL5U
    – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJuUKcHNtL0
    – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4r6LEwr6Fs

    (dari Channel Islam Menjawab Tuduhan)
    – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IR_2UQxGqk

    Walau bagaimanapun,disini kita tetap akan menjawab video dari Si keldai Christian Prince secara penulisan sekaligus meruntuhkan fitnah Christian Prince dan membuktikan bahawa Si Keldai itu hanya menghalalkan cara dengan pembohongan. Semoga bermanfaat~

    CLAIM NO.1
    Christian Prince berkata bahawa Hafs Ibn Sulaiman lahir 250 tahun setelah kewafatan Nabi Muhammad SAW.

    MAB response :
    Nabi Muhammad SAW wafat pada tahun 632 Masihi (bersamaan 11 Hijrah) sedangkan Hafs Ibn Sulaiman lahir pada tahun 709 Masihi (bersamaan tahun 70 Hijrah).

    709 Masihi – 632 Masihi = 77 tahun #

    Jadi jarak antara Hafs Ibn Sulaiman dengan Nabi Muhammad SAW adalah 77 tahun.

    BUSTED! KEBOHONGAN PERTAMA CHRISTIAN PRINCE RUNTUH!

    CLAIM NO.2
    Christian Prince bertanya soalan,
    – Bagaimana muslim mengatakan Quran kini adalah dari para Sahabah sedangkan ianya hanyalah hafalan Hafs?

    MAB response :
    Kerana Quran kini menggunakan sistem Isnad yang mana ianya adalah bersanadh bermula dari :

    Nabi Muhammad SAW – Abi Ibn Kaab – Zaid Ibn Tsabit – Ali bin Abi Thalib – Uthman Ibn Affan – Abu Abdul Rahman – Asim – Hafs #

    Jadi sanadh inilah menjadi bukti bahawa bacaan mushaf Quran kini adalah dari Rasm Uthmani yang berasal dari Nabi Muhammad SAW.

    Di United Kingdom (UK),dari zaman sebelum Empayar British lagi bertutur menggunakan Form Mother Tongue of English Language dengan loghat Received Pronunciation Standard Scottish English sehingga zaman moden kini :

    Early Form : Old English – Middle English – Early Modern English

    Language family: Indo-European – Germanic – West Germanic – Anglo Frisian – Anglic – English – British English.

    Jika saya ikut corak pemikiran kolot Si Keldai Christian Prince,apakah loghat British English tidak berasal dari Old English??

    Jika YA,maka Christian Prince akui bahawa hafalan Hafs berasal dari bacaan Rasm Uthmani dan Nabi Muhammad SAW secara sistem bersanadh.

    Jika TIDAK,maka Christian Prince akui bahawa loghat Received Pronunciation Standard Scottish English yang ditutur pakai oleh rakyat United Kingdom zaman kini adalah salah kerana menyeleweng dan tidak berasal dari Old English.

    CHRISTIAN PRINCE KELIHATAN BODOH DALAM MENGETAHUI HAFAZAN QIRAAT DARI HAFS!

    CLAIM NO.3
    Christian Prince mengatakan Hafs merupakan seorang penipu kerana banyak hadith yang diriwayatkan oleh Hafs adalah Matruk dan Dhaif menurut Ulama Muhadithin.

    MAB response :
    Disini kebodohan Christian Prince terserlah…..mari kita ajar Christian Prince bagaimana faham penjelasan Muhadithin :

    01 – Ingin saya maklumkan bahawa Hafs ditolak dalam bidang Hadith BUKAN kerana dia seorang penipu tetapi kerana pengetahuan beliau dalam bidang Hadith masih kurang disebabkan beliau banyak kesalahan dalam meriwayatkan Hadith dan masih banyak kelemahan untuk menjadi seorang reporter Hadith Nabi. Jadi dalam bidang Hadith,Hafs tidak boleh dipercayai di atas kekurangan beliau dalam kemahiran penguasaan Hadith. Disini saya berikan sumber dari penjelasan terperinci Muhadithin tentang masalah Hafs dalam meriwayatkan Hadith :
    – https://www.islamweb.net/en/fatwa/314071/criticism-of-hafs-as-a-weak-reporter-of-hadeeth
    – https://www.islamweb.net/emainpage/PrintFatwa.php?lang=E&Id=314071

    02 – Walau Hafs ditolak dalam bidang Hadith kerana keterbatasan pengetahuannya dalam bidang tersebut,namun Hafs di akui sebagai seorang yang mahir dalam bacaan Qiraat Kalamullah Al-Quran’ul-Kareem. Disini saya berikan bukti keterangan dari para ulama :

    Abu Shaamah
    “Abu Bakr Al-Khateeb said,”The early scholars of Quran declared Hafs more accurate and better than Abu Bakr ibn Ayyaash as far as the memorization of the Quran is concerned.”
    [Sharh Ash-Shaatibiyyah No.6/99]

    Ath-Thahabi
    “Hafs was an accurate reciter of the Quran and a weak reporter of Hadeeth because he did not excel in the filed of Hadeeth like he did in the field of Quran recitation. Otherwise, he was a truthful and honest man.”
    [Kitab Al-Mizaan]

    Abu Umar Al-Baazaz
    “Hafs the Quran reciter is not trustworthy in Hadith. However,his Quranic recitation is more accurate and correct than Abu Bakr ibn Ayyaash but Abu Bakr is more trustworthy than him in Hadith.”
    [Kitab Al-Kaamel]

    Namun,saya memahami ada seorang ulama iaitu Abd Ar-Rahmaan ibn Yoosuf ibn Khiraash menuduh Hafs seorang pendusta kerana kononnya Hafs banyak membohongi kata-kata lisan sabda Muhammad SAW dalam Hadith.

    Walau bagaimanapun,ulama Al-Haafith Ibn Hajar telah menjawab kritikan Abd Ar-Rahman Ibn Yoosuf Ibn Khiraash terhadap Hafs. Disini penjelasan maklum balas Al-Haafith Ibn Hajar tentang kritikan Abd Ar-Rahman Ibn Yoosuf Ibn Khiraash terhadap Hafs :
    “The criticism made by a person who has enmity fueled by the difference in ideological affiliation and beliefs towards his subject of criticism (criticized person) must be rejected. When a wise person ponders over the criticism of Is-haq Al-Jawzajaani against the people of Kufa, he can easily notice strange things due to his deviation in nasb (being a naasibi among those who consider other families, especially the Ummayads, better than the Ahl Al-Bayt) and due the fact that people of Kufa were well-known for their Shiism; so he continued to arrogantly and carelessly criticize all the people of Kufa that he mentioned in his writings to the extent that he even criticized Al-Amash, Abu Nuaym,Ubaydullaah ibn Moosa and other great scholars of hadeeth known for their authentic narration and trustworthiness. Hence, if he had declared some narrator untrustworthy but another imaam who is like him or more experienced in hadeeth than him happened to disagree with him and declared that narrator trustworthy, then the opinion of the other imaam will be accepted. The same applies to Abd Ar-Rahmaan ibn Yoosuf ibn Khiraash was among the Shiite fanatics as well and was even affiliated with the Raafidhah sect. So his criticism for the people of the Levant was driven by enmity based on ideological background and beliefs. As for what Abd Ar-Rahmaan ibn Yoosuf ibn Khiraash said about Hafs, his opinion accusing Hafs of deliberately fabricating lies and attributing them to the Prophet, cannot be accepted because he was one of the fanatic Shiites. He was even affiliated with the Raafidhah sect. The Raafidhah were called as such because they deserted and rejected Zayd ibn ‘Ali when he refused to repudiate and condemn the first three Rightly Guided Caliphs (Abu bakr, ‘Umar and ‘Uthmaan), while the Raafidhah did not recognize them as the legitimate successors of the Prophet. He was known for his unfair criticism merely based on ideological affiliation.”
    [Kitab Al-Lisaan]

    JELAS HAFS BUKANLAH SEORANG PENIPU TETAPI CHRISTIAN PRINCE YANG MENIPU KERANA HANYA MENGAMBIL SEKERAT DARI COMMENTARY MUHADITHIN TANPA AMBIL SECARA KONTEKS!!

    Giliran saya “putar meja” kepada Si Keldai Christian Prince…ingin saya berikan tiga (03) soalan kepada Christian Prince :

    01 – Ancient Hebrew atau dipanggil Classical Hebrew asalnya tidak ada Hukum Tanwin. Sama seperti Semetic Arabic (Classical Arabic) yang menjadi asal tulisan Quranic Arabic,tiga bahasa (termasuk Aramaic) ini memiliki huruf yang dipanggil sebagai “Huruf Mati”. Ancient Hebrew atau dipanggil Paleo Hebrew ini hanya Israel Kuno sahaja yang mampu baca. Itu pun ada dua jenis iaitu Samaritan Hebrew dan Masoretic Hebrew. Ada jenis yang ketiga dipanggil Mishnaic Hebrew (Amoraic style) tetapi bahasa ini khusus digunakan untuk penulisan kitab Rabbinic seperti Talmudh,Mithna dan Midrash sahaja. Dua jenis ini pun suda saling kelihatan berbeza. Akibat dari kepentingan masing-masing bahasa Hebrew yang berbeza ditulis dalam kitab suci,TNKH (Bible Hebrew) dan Old Testament Bible Christian mengalami kesalahan Grammatical. Disini saya bagi dua contoh sahaja :
    – dalam Torah Masoretic kitab Genesis 22:2 menyebut Amoria manakala dalam Torah Samaritan kitab Genesis 22:2 menyebut Amore. Amore dan Amoria berbeza. Amoria terletak di Jerussalem manakala Amore terletak di Nablus. Perselisihan dengan huruf Yodh’ sahaja suda cukup mengubah makna. Sebab itu mengapa dalam John 4:21,wanita bertanya kepada Jesus gunung mana harus mereka jadikan sebagai kiblat sebab wanita itu tahu bahawa ada perbezaan antara Torah Masoretic dengan Torah Samaritan. Dalam Teks Samaritan merujuk sebagai Gunung Gerizim manakala Masoretic merujuk sebagai Gunung Ebal. Saya ingin bertanya,antara kedua kitab Torah (Masoretic dan Samaritan) yang menggunakan dua bahasa Hebrew yang berbeza,mana satu rujukan bacaan ayat Genesis 22:2 yang benar???

    02 – Bahasa Greek asalnya ada tiga jenis iaitu Classical Greek dan Koine Greek serta Medieval Greek. Classical Greek ada tiga (03) jenis iaitu Proto Greek,Ancient Greek dan Mycenaean Greek. Koine Greek atau dipanggil juga sebagai Helenistic Greek pun suda berbeza dengan Classical Greek tetapi memiliki sedikit persamaan dengan Medieval Greek. Kini,wujudnya Standard Greek atau Modern Greek agar 17 juta pengguna Greek dari Greece dan lima (05) negara berdekatan dapat bertutur antara satu sama lain. Saya bertanya,mengapa New Testament dalam Bible memakai Koine Greek sedang Jesus Christ pbuh tidak pernah bertutur Koine Greek walau bahasa antarabangsa ketika era nubuwwah baginda adalah Koine Greek???

    03 – Bible anda kini juga berbeza setiap denominasi Kekristianian :
    – 61 Kitab (Syrian Bible)
    – 66 Kitab (Protestant Bible)
    – 73 Kitab (Roman Catholic Bible)
    – 75 Kitab (Orthodox Coptic Bible)
    – 76 Kitab (Charismatic Bible)
    – 78 Kitab (Greek Orthodox Bible)
    – 81 Kitab (Ethiopic Bible)
    – 86 Kitab (Eastern Orthodox Bible)

    Dari semua di atas ini,mana satu Bible yang berasal dari lisan sabda Jesus Christ pbuh dan benar-benar berasal dari zaman Early Christian pada era Nubuwwah Jesus Christ pbuh?

    RUMUSAN
    – Christian Prince berbohong tentang jarak umur antara Hafs dengan Muhammad SAW.
    – Christian Prince jahil dalam sistem Isnadh Quranic Qiraat.
    – Christian Prince meutar belit dan menipu dengan hanya mengambil sekerat dari Commentary Muhadithin.

    KESIMPULAN
    Hafs ibn Sulaiman adalah seorang Quran reciter yang benar dan bacaannya berasal dari rasm Uthman Ibn Affan dan Muhammad SAW. Cuma beliau ditolak dalam bidang Hadith disebabkan keterbatasan ilmunya BUKAN kerana beliau seorang yang pendusta mutlak.

    Christian Prince telah terbukti melakukan pendustaan dan kelihatan bodoh dalam videonya. Nampaknya Si Keldai Christian Prince masih GAGAL membuktikan Quran suda tidak asli dan GAGAL buktikan Islam agama salah.

    Saya,semua saudara muslim yang lain dan sesiapa yang mengetahui hakikat kebenaran hanya akan mentertawakan Christian Prince dan sesiapa yang menjadi Penggemar Tegar Christian Prince yang bodoh itu.

    Islam agama yang benar…pesan Jesus Christ pbuh :
    “Jikalau kamu tetap dalam sabdaku,kamu benar-benar adalah muridku.dan kamu akan mengetahui kebenaran, dan kebenaran itu akan memerdekakan kamu.”
    [John 8:31-32]
    – memerdekakan anda dari kekufuran…

    “Itulah sebabnya aku berkata-kata dalam perumpamaan kepada mereka; kerana sekalipun melihat, mereka tidak melihat dan sekalipun mendengar, mereka tidak mendengar dan tidak mengerti.”
    [Matthew 13:13]

    pesan Rasullullah Muhammad SAW :
    “Terimalah kebenaran itu walau ianya pahit..”
    [Hadith Sahih Bukhari dan Tirmizi]

    Firman Allah Azza’Wa’Jalla :
    “Yang benar telah datang dan yang batil telah lenyap.Sesungguhnya yang batil itu adalah sesuatu yang pasti lenyap.”
    [Al-Isra 17:81]

    Tiada Tuhan selain Allah,Jesus dan Muhammad adalah Utusan Allah serta Jibrail Sayyid Malak Al-Qhuwwaan adalah Ruhul Quddus.

  • Facts about the unique eloquence of The Noble Quran

    Facts about the unique eloquence of The Noble Quran

    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم

    The first audiences of the Qur’an were the desert-dwellers of Arabia,who were proud of their language skills. Their material possessions were meager,but their language was far in advance of their culture. They earned their livelihood by trading and took many trips abroad to buy and sell goods. Their long journeys across the desert provided them the time to ponder about nature, and the order of the nature of things. They were very meticulous in their choice of words, and very specific in their speech. They adored oratory and diction, and effective communication. They were skillful in the articulation of finer thoughts, and quite adroit in their expression of ideas. Words were their wares, and eloquence was their fetish and forte. Communicating finer thoughts in the finest form was their obsession. Composing poetry and prose was their passion. They vied each other in their ability to be fluent and eloquent. They produced elegant literature of high quality, even though the subjects they chose were mostly petty and profane. They squandered their skills in embellishing the tales of their tryst, their amorous exploits and adventures, the exaggerated and boastful accounts of their valor in warfare, and the virtues of their wine and women. Their written literature was scanty, but they had a prolific memory and committed thousands of quotes, anecdotes and poems to memory. Their literature was passed along to subsequent generations by oral traditions. So proud were they of their diction and eloquence that they declared themselves to be the masters of the language, and others to be deprived of the faculty of speech. Compared to theirs, other languages were merely the crude communications of inarticulate mute men. They referred to all non-Arabs as ‘`Ajams’, those suffering from a speech impediment.

    When the Arabs first heard the Qur’an, they were awe-struck by its eloquence and listened in amazement. Never before in their life had they heard such a stunning and stately sermon. Their instincts convinced them that such a noble and impressive discourse could only be a divine diction, not a human creation. It was far more sublime and solemn than all their literature put together. The Qur’an proclaimed that it was not a man-made composition, and challenged its audience to present any composition that matches its style and elegance. It declared that humans would fail to produce a single composition to match its caliber, even if they joined hands and converged and coordinated their efforts. It threw the gauntlet,

    “And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our slave [Muhammad], then produce a Surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful.”
    [Al-Baqarah 2:23]

    The expert composers of Arabia heard the dare, but could not come up with an answer. Compared to the Qur’an their literary endeavors appeared clumsy and childish. They felt like they were inexperienced novices. The distinguished and prolific poets seemed immature. The enthusiastic orators found themselves at a loss for words. They were humbled and humiliated by the words of the Qur’an. The masters of the Arabic language failed to find any flaw or lapse in the language of the Qur’an. They acknowledged defeat and expressed their inability to match it. Many were so mesmerized by its message that they embraced Islam right there and then. The internal evidence of the Qur’an is enough to dispel doubts. When one reads it, it becomes clear that no man could have written it.

    Man is the subject of the Qur’an. It narrates the story of man as an integral whole, and it describes all the stages of man’s journey to his ultimate destination, his birth, life, death, resurrection, the judgment of his deeds and depending upon the judgment, heaven or hell. In this temporal and physical world, the observation and experience of man is restricted to his birth, the trials and tribulations of his life and his death. His five senses do not enable him to perceive an existence beyond the confines of this physical world. The eyes do not see light emanating from the other world, and the ears do not detect sounds from the other side. The hands cannot feel, the nose cannot smell, and the tongue cannot taste anything that is not of this world. The mind therefore fails to perceive the presence of the world beyond.

    The great beyond lies past the borders of death. Resurrection, the judgment of deeds, and heaven and hell are events scheduled to take place there. Fluently and poignantly, and with an aura of confidence, the Qur’an describes these events in detail. It narrates with the knowledge of certainty. It discusses the events of the other world with the same ease and eloquence as the events of this world. Ever since it was first revealed its diction and eloquence remain unsurpassed, not only in Arabic but also in all languages of the world. The challenge still stands. Man will never be able to match its literary quality.

    The difference between the Qur’an and the work of the poets, writers and philosophers is not only that of degree or quality, but also that of character and class. It did not stoop down to the earthy model of distortion and dishonesty. Rather, it aggrandized and sanitized the standards of literature, and introduced it to a new height. It imposed a tougher requirement for literary standard and demanded absolute honesty and accuracy. It refused to espouse fiction and the art of fictionalizing facts, and spurned exaggeration. It did not win by using the ways and means of the other literary works.

    The literary giants know the rules of grammar and diction. Yet, they cannot comply with the rule laid down by the Qur’an. They are handicapped because their expertise is of no avail without falsehood and fiction. If exaggeration was to be edited out of their work, they would not be left with much of their work. They cannot imagine poetry without a degree of lies and embellishment. Thus the Qur’an unfettered the facts and liberated the truth from the clutches of its captors – the poets, the writers and the philosophers of the past, present and the future. It exposed their craftiness. When it comes to matters pertaining to this world, they do know the facts but do not always choose to be honest and accurate. However, when it comes to matters past the grave, they are actually the charlatans relying on guesses and conjectures.
    “And most of them follow not except assumption. Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all. Indeed, Allah is Knowing of what they do.”
    [Yunus 10:36]

    “And if you obey most of those upon the earth, they will mislead you from the way of Allah. They follow not except assumption, and they are not but falsifying.”
    [Al-An’am 6:116]

    The Qur’an defied the accepted norms of literature and achieved eloquence and eminence without resorting to exaggeration of any sort. Because of that, every literary classic created in any period of history and in any language of the world, would fall in a class lower than that of the Qur’an. It has a unique character all its own. It lays down facts plainly, and meticulously adheres to accurate narration. Even when it quotes a parable, the comparison is never misleading and it does not twist or bend the truth. The words and phrases it uses bring out the unadulterated truth. It is sworn to tell nothing but the truth. Precision is its priority, and all of its text can be accepted literally. Scientific treatise should be that exact. Its adherence to accuracy when it comes to matters pertaining to this world infuses faith and confidence into its believers. They become convinced that the events scheduled to occur beyond death are also depicted with the same accuracy and precision, and without exaggeration. The reason the Qur’an has remained matchless in substance and style is because it is the absolute truth. About itself, it says:
    “These are the verses of Allah which We recite to you, [O Muhammad], in truth. And indeed,you are from among the messengers.”
    [Al-Baqarah 2:252]

    “He has sent down upon you, [O Muhammad], the Book in truth, confirming what was before it. And He revealed the Torah and the Gospel.”
    [Aal-`Imran 3:3]

    more detail,please visit here :
    – http://www.the-faith.com/featured/facts-unique-eloquence-quran/