Skip to content

Rebuttal To Sabda Harian Dan Pendeta Esra Soru – “Benarkah Jesus Di Angkat Jadi Tuhan Pada Tahun 325?”

Last updated on September 20, 2019

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم

“Eternally begotten of the Father,God from God,light from light,true God from true God.”
[Original Nicea Creed 325 AD]

Pada 30 Oktober 2018,pengarang Sabda Harian telah memaparkan satu video dari Pendeta Esra Soru menjawab Hj.Irena Handono dalam artikelnya yang bertajuk “Benarkah Yesus hanya diangkat jadi Tuhan pada tahun 325?”. Artikel tersebut boleh rujuk disini :
– http://sabdaharian.com/benarkah-yesus-hanya-diangkat-jadi-tuhan-tahun-325/

Sebenarnya video dari artikel Sabda Harian tersebut di ambil dari sumber disini :
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbypciKt4y0

Berkenaan ayat-ayat Bible yang mendukung “ketuhanan” Jesus Christ pbuh telah saya jawab disini :
– https://muslim-apologetic-borneo.com/eesa-al-masih-alaihissalam-ibni-maryam-bukan-tuhan-dalam-bible/

Sumber dari Exegess muslim :
– https://www.islamreligion.com/articles/10454/90-verses-says/
– http://tellmeaboutislam.com/90-verses-jesus-is-not-god.html

Disini saya berikan sumber menjawab Pendeta Esra Soru yang mana Bapa Kegerejaan Christianity di awal abad pertama dan abad kedua HAMPIR MANDATORI tidak secara rasmi menganggap Jesus Christ pbuh adalah tuhan :
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/smith_scholarship_rebuttal_3.htm
– http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/churchfathers.html
– http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/ac0_fathers.htm#fathers

Memandangkan dalam artikel Sabda Harian itu hanya dipaparkan video jawapan dari Pendeta Esra Soru,maka disini saya menjawab videonya dengan berikan sumber dari Exegess Muslim,Atheist dan Exegess Christians sendiri sekaligus membuktikan bahawa Jesus di ISYTIHARKAN menjadi tuhan SECARA RASMI dalam Council of Nicea pada 325 AD :

Sumber dari Atheist :
– http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/bc0_doctrine.htm#creeds
– http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/af0_councils.htm
– https://vridar.org/2015/10/01/what-biblical-scholars-say-about-historical-jesus-studies/#more-62430
– https://youtu.be/cA6_pDMovDU
– https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jesus/The-dogma-of-Christ-in-the-ancient-councils
– http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/jesus/ntwright.html

Sumber dari Muslim :
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/trinityhistory.htm
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/sd_bible_students.htm
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=2936.0
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/umar_hassan/trinity.htm
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/the_embarrassing_2.htm
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/false_jesus_of_christianity.htm
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/ac/trinity1.htm
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/ac/continue.htm
– http://www.answering-christianity.com/sake14.htm
– http://muslimprophets.com/video.php?vid=3305
– http://muslimprophets.com/article.php?aid=47
– https://www.islamtomorrow.com/bible/Arianism_vs_council_nicaea.htm
– https://www.islamtomorrow.com/bible/NicaeaCouncil325.htm
– https://themuslimtimes.info/2011/11/30/the-council-of-nicaea-and-three-others/

Sumber dari Christian :
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjKBJJInP2k
– https://www.ancient.eu/article/1205/early-christianity/
– https://www.godglorified.com/errors_of_the_trinity.htm
– https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/First_Council_of_Nicaea
– https://www.biblicalunitarian.com/articles/history/the-trinity-what-is-it-and-where-did-it-come-from
– https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Roman%20Catholicism/lie_of_roman_catholicism.htm
– http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3801.htm
– http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11044a.htm
– http://www.researchthetruth.com/christian/beginningsofchristianity2.html

Disini saya berikan beberapa kenyataan dari Exegess Christianity dan Historians :

“The formulation ‘one God in three persons’ was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, prior to the end of the 4th century.”
[The New Catholic Encyclopedia 1967]

“The Council of Nicaea met on May 20, 325. Constantine himself presiding, actively guiding the discussion, and personally proposed the crucial formula expressing the relation of Christ to God in the creed issued by the council. ‘of one substance with the father.’ Over-awed by the emperor, the bishops, with two exceptions only, signed the creed, many of them against their inclination. Constantine regarded the decision of Nicaea as divinely inspired. As long as he lived no one dared openly to challenge the creed of Nicaea.”
[Encyclopedia Britannica 1968]

“Christianity did not destroy paganism; it adopted it. From Egypt came the ideas of a divine trinity.” And in the book Egyptian Religion, Siegfried Morenz notes: “The trinity was a major preoccupation of Egyptian theologians . . . Three gods are combined and treated as a single being, addressed in the singular. In this way the spiritual force of Egyptian religion shows a direct link with Christian theology.”
[Will Durant – The Promise of the Trinity, page 31]

“No historical fact is better established, than that the doctrine of one God, pure and uncompounded, was that of the early ages of Christianity . . . Nor was the unity of the Supreme Being ousted from the Christian creed by the force of reason, but by the sword of civil government, wielded at the will of the Athanasius. The hocus-pocus phantasm of a God like another Cerberus, with one body and three heads, had its birth and growth in the blood of thousands of martyrs . . . The Athanasian paradox that one is three, and three but one, is so incomprehensible to the human mind, that no candid man can say he has any idea of it, and how can he believe what presents no idea? He who thinks he does, only deceives himself. He proves, also, that man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind. With such person, gullibility which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason, and the mind becomes a wreck.”
[Thomas Jefferson: Letter to James Smith, Dec. 8 / 1822]

“The word Trinity is not found in the Bible . . . It did not find a place formally in the theology of the church till the 4th century.”
[The Illustrated Bible Dictionary]

“Christianity derived from Judaism and Judaism was strictly Unitarian [believing that God is one person]. The road which led from Jerusalem to Nicaea was scarcely a straight one. Fourth century Trinitarianism did not reflect accurately early Christian teaching regarding the nature of God; it was, on the contrary, a deviation from this teaching.”
[The Encyclopedia American 1956, Vol.XXVII, page 294L]

“”Neither the word Trinity, nor the explicit doctrine as such, appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the Shema in the Old Testament:’Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord’ — Deut. 6:4 . . . The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies . . . By the end of the 4th century . . . the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since.”
[The New Encyclopedia Britannica (1976) Micropædia, Vol.X, page 126]

“Jesus Christ never mentioned such a phenomenon, and nowhere in the New Testament does the word ‘Trinity’ appear. The idea was only adopted by the Church three hundred years after the death of our Lord.”
[Arthur Weigall – The Paganism in Our Christianity]

“In brief, the ante-Nicene Fathers taught the real distinction and divinity of the three persons . . . but in their attempts at a philosophical interpretation of the Dogma, the ante-Nicene Fathers used certain expressions which would favor sudordinationism. In the late 17th century, the Socinians cited these expressions that the ante-Nicene tradition agreed rather with Arius than with Athanasius . . . Catholic theologians commonly defend the orthodoxy of these early Fathers, while admitting that certain of their expressions were inaccurate and eventually dangerous.”
[Colliers Encyclopedia]

RUMUSAN BERKENAAN AJARAN SEMUA COUNCIL
325 AD Council of Nicea – “Jesus is God” dan “Triune God”
381 AD Council of Constantinople – “Holy Spirit is God”
431 AD Council of Ephesus – “Mother Mary is part of Trinity” dan “human beings are totally depraved”
451 AD Council of Chalcedon – “Jesus Christ is both man and God”

KESIMPULAN
Tidak dinafikan bahawa ada segelintir telah menganggap Jesus Christ pbuh adalah tuhan pada era abad pertama dan kedua tetapi ianya tidak secara jelas dan tidak dominian. Bahkan semasa era Nubuwwah Jesus Christ pbuh pun,ada sebahagian kecil dari orang Israel telah menganggap Jesus Christ pbuh adalah Anak Tuhan,sebahagian besar dari mereka menganggap Jesus adalah Al-Masih Palsu dan anak haram serta hanya sedikit (seramai 72 pengikutnya termasuk 12 Hawariyyun) yang menganggap Jesus adalah Nabi wa Rasul. Namun demikian,Jesus di angkat menjadi tuhan SECARA RASMI BESAR-BESARAN ialah pada 325 AD di Council of Nicea.

Dari situ terciptanya Syahadah Nicea :
“We believe in one God the Father All-Sovereign, maker of all things visible and invisible;

“And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten of the Father, only-begotten, that is, of the substance of the Father, God of God, Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten, not made, of one substance with the Father, through whom all things were made, things in heaven and on earth; who for us men and for our salvation came down and was made flesh, and became man, suffered, and rose on the third day, ascended into the heavens, is coming to judge living and dead.

“And (we believe) in the Holy Spirit.

“But those who say, ‘There was (a time) when he (Jesus) was not (in existence),’ and ‘Before he (Jesus) was begotten he was not (in existence),’ or that ‘He (Jesus) came into being from what-is-not,’ or those that allege, that the Son of God is ‘Of a different substance or essence’ or ‘created’ or ‘changeable’ or ‘alterable,’ these the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes (condemns).”

Datangnya Muhammad SAW 275 tahun selepas Council of Nicea untuk membersihkan kembali ajaran tuhan disampaikan dari Jesus Christ pbuh yang telah di ubah dan di pesong dengan membawa kitabullah Al-Quranul Kareem yang menjadi Perjanjian Terakhir memberitahu bahawa Jesus Christ pbuh BUKAN Tuhan :

Demi sesungguhnya! Telah kafirlah orang-orang yang berkata: “Bahawasanya Allah ialah Al-Masih Ibni Maryam”. Padahal Al-Masih sendiri berkata:” Wahai Bani Israil! Sembahlah Allah, Tuhanku dan Tuhan kamu, Bahawasanya sesiapa yang mempersekutukan Allah dengan sesuatu yang lain, maka sesungguhnya Allah haramkan kepadanya Syurga, dan tempat kembalinya ialah neraka; dan tiadalah seorang penolong pun bagi orang-orang yang berlaku zalim.Demi sesungguhnya telah kafirlah orang-orang yang berkata: “Bahawasanya Allah ialah salah satu dari tiga”. Padahal tiada Tuhan melainkan Tuhan yang Maha Esa. Dan jika mereka tidak berhenti dari apa yang mereka katakan itu, sudah tentu orang-orang yang kafir dari antara mereka akan dikenakan azab seksa yang tidak terperi sakitnya.”
[Al-Maidah 5:72-73]

Pendeta Esra Soru hanya menegakkan benang yang basah! anda (Esra Soru) boleh menafi dengan pelbagai alasan dan boleh putar belit pelbagai taktik,tapi anda tidak boleh sembunyikan kebenaran yang hakiki!

pesan Jesus Christ pbuh kepada anda :
“Jikalau kamu tetap dalam sabdaku,kamu benar-benar adalah muridku.dan kamu akan mengetahui kebenaran, dan kebenaran itu akan memerdekakan kamu.”
[John 8:31-32]
– memerdekakan anda dari kekufuran…

pesan Rasullullah Muhammad SAW kepada anda :
“Terimalah kebenaran itu walau ianya pahit..”
[Hadith Sahih Bukhari dan Tirmizi]

“Dan katakanlah: yang benar telah datang dan yang batil pasti akan lenyap, sungguh yang batil itu adalah sesuatu yang pasti lenyap”.
[Al-Israa’ 17:81]